Infertility has been associated with psychological distress and can have a negative impact on quality of life in cancer survivors. Reproductive concerns are often sited among young cancer survivors prior to, and following cancer treatment. A number of fertility preservation (FP) options are available to preserve patients’ future reproductive ability. For men, sperm banking is a clinically established method, and a relatively straightforward procedure in comparison to FP for women, which is more complex. In a new article published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by authors Gabriela M. Armuand, Kenny A. Rodriguez-Wallberg, Lena Wettergren, Johan Ahlgren, Gunilla Enblad, Martin Ho ̈glund, and Claudia Lampic, entitled, “Sex Differences in Fertility-Related Information Received by Young Adult Cancer Survivors,” the authors investigate male and female cancer survivors’ perception of fertility-related information and use of FP in connection with cancer treatment during reproductive age.
The authors used a sample of 484 survivors diagnosed from 2003 to 2007 identified in population-based registry in Sweden. Inclusion criteria included survivors who were age 18 to 45 years at the time of diagnosis and had lymphoma, acute leukemia, testicular cancer, ovarian cancer, or female breast cancer treated with chemotherapy. Study participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire assessing their experience with FP and knowledge of FP techniques following a cancer diagnosis.
The majority of male participants reported having received information about treatment impact on fertility (80%) and more than half of the men banked frozen sperm (54%). Among women, less than half reported that they received information about treatment impact on fertility, and 14% reported that they received information about FP. Only seven women, or 2%, underwent FP. Sex was the single most important predictor for receipt of information about FP; a man was 14 times more likely to report having received such information than a woman. The results of this study are even more interesting when you take into account that in Sweden, infertility treatment is part of the tax-funded health care system; therefore, FP is available to all patients with cancer. Nonetheless, this did not seem to have an impact on female access to FP information and services.
The results of this study suggest significant sex differences when conveying fertility-related information and the use of FP. As a result, the authors argue that there is an urgent need to develop fertility-related information adapted to female patients with cancer to improve their opportunities to participate in informed decision-making regarding their treatment and future reproductive options. In an effort to meet the needs of young female cancer patients, the Oncofertility Consortium developed educational materials to help young women and their families better understand their fertility preservation options. Read, “Sex Differences in Fertility-Related Information Received by Young Adult Cancer Survivors.”